Let’s talk ↗Bring cloud, code, identity, and remediation workflows into the same conversation. Explore connection patterns designed around the evidence your team needs and the tools where work happens.
12 connection patterns across four security workflows.
Integration planning · Patterns shown for technical evaluation. Connector availability and permissions require confirmation; this website does not connect accounts.
Technical overview ↗12 integration patterns
Browse by application or security workflowInventory, IAM policy context, network configuration, and storage exposure.
A scoped cross-account role and approved resource access; exact policies must be reviewed.
Cloud account → resource → identity → data
Subscription inventory, workload identities, role assignments, and network exposure.
Tenant and subscription scope, application permissions, and organization approval.
Subscription → resource group → workload
Project inventory, IAM bindings, workload identity, and data resource policies.
Approved projects and service identity with narrowly scoped access.
Organization → project → service account
Workload metadata, namespace ownership, role bindings, and service exposure.
Cluster API scope and read permissions; secrets should stay outside inventory collection.
Namespace → workload → service account
Repository ownership, deployment changes, dependency context, and engineering handoffs.
Approved repositories, narrowly scoped app permissions, and signed webhook handling.
Repository → deployment → service
Project ownership, merge request context, and pipeline-to-workload relationships.
Project scope and approved API or webhook access; verify required event types.
Project → pipeline → deployed workload
Application identities, groups, and role relationships relevant to effective access.
Tenant approval, specific directory permissions, and agreed identity-data handling.
Principal → group → role assignment
Workforce identity context, group membership, and application assignments.
Organization scope, API authorization, and identity-data retention requirements.
User → group → application
An investigation handoff containing evidence, ownership, and validation criteria.
Project access and approved issue operations; write actions require a defined workflow.
Finding → issue → validation record
Routing security work to the responsible service or assignment group.
Instance access, table and operation scope, assignment mapping, and approval flow.
Finding → service owner → work item
A concise notification linking the owning team to an investigation or work item.
Approved workspace and channels; minimize sensitive data in messages.
Priority change → channel notification
Team notifications with links to the source investigation and remediation work.
Approved tenant and destination channels; confirm the delivery mechanism and permissions.
Review event → team notification
No matching applications. Try another search or category.
Approved metadata and events from explicitly scoped sources.
Link resources, access, ownership, and observations with provenance.
Route selected findings to approved destinations with minimal data.
Conceptual integration flow. Event delivery, refresh frequency, destination support, and execution permissions depend on the agreed implementation.
Specify organizations, accounts, projects, repositories, and destination channels. Keep read access separate from ticket creation, notifications, or remediation actions.
List fields collected, expected refresh behavior, timestamps, retention, and deletion requirements. Agree how stale or partial evidence will appear.
Assign an integration owner. Define credential rotation, revocation, rate-limit handling, retries, delivery monitoring, and incident escalation.
Share your required sources, destination tools, and access constraints.