CONNECTED SECURITY FOR A CONNECTED WORLD Explore the platform ↗
Let’s talk ↗
Home / Platform
PLATFORM

One connected perspective.
From evidence to action.

Explore the context model, investigate an example attack path, and see how a reporting view can support a more informed security review.

THE SKUR.AI PLATFORM

One platform perspective.
Every layer in focus.

Security is stronger when everything connects. Bring your environment into focus, understand what’s exposed, and give your team a clear path forward.

CLOUD SECURITY

Your entire cloud.
Nothing in the shadows.

Build a connected picture of your cloud assets, identities, and data. Bring hidden exposures to the surface and understand how small risks can become bigger threats.

Start the conversation ↗
Environment overviewIllustrative data
Connected assets2,408
Priority paths08 ↗
☁ Production environmentConnected
⌘ Application servicesConnected
▧ Data infrastructureConnected
◈ Context makes the difference.
THE CONNECTED SECURITY MODEL

Understand the system.
See the relationships.

A conceptual architecture showing how security evidence can come together. Relationships help explain why an exposure matters and who can resolve it.

REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE · CONCEPTUAL MODEL
SECURITY CONTEXT / REFERENCE MODEL05 evidence domains → 01 shared view
Cloud infrastructureResources · network exposure
Source codeRepositories · dependencies
IdentitiesRoles · effective permissions
AI servicesModels · tools · endpoints
DataClassification · access

Security context layer

Asset relationships + exposure evidence + ownership + business context

01Attack-path analysisConnect exposure, access & impact02Risk prioritizationReview evidence & business context03Remediation routingAssign ownership & validate change

Read from top to bottom: evidence sources inform a shared context model, which supports investigation and remediation decisions. This diagram describes an approach, not confirmed integrations.

FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

A finding is a signal.
A path tells the story.

Explore a hypothetical path from an exposed application to sensitive storage. Select a step to review its risk, example evidence, and suggested action.

INVESTIGATION WORKSPACEEXAMPLE PATH / EXP-001
INTERACTIVE EXAMPLE · HYPOTHETICAL ENVIRONMENT
ENVIRONMENT Production / exampleRESOURCE CHAIN Application → Role → StorageREVIEW STATUS Requires validation
RISK TO INVESTIGATE

An application is reachable from the internet.

Reachability creates an entry point. It does not prove compromise; review the service configuration and application behavior.

EXAMPLE EVIDENCE

A public load balancer routes traffic to the application service. An inbound rule allows HTTPS from any address.

SUGGESTED ACTION

Confirm public access is necessary. Review authentication, patch status, and network restrictions with the service owner.

An attack path is a hypothesis to validate. Exposure and permissions alone do not demonstrate an exploitable vulnerability or an active incident.

A WORKING VIEW OF RISK

Make progress
visible.

Example reporting views for a security review. Read the trend alongside coverage and open work; a lower finding count alone does not establish a safer environment.

◈   Security program overviewILLUSTRATIVE DATA · SIX WEEK SAMPLE
Open priority findings24Week 6 snapshot
Assets assessed216 / 24090% of sample inventory
Remediations validated18Completed during sample period
Awaiting validation06Changes require verification
Open priority findings over timeCount of unresolved findings at each weekly review
Open priority findings over six weeksWeek one 48, week two 42, week three 45, week four 36, week five 29, week six 24. Illustrative data.6040200W1W2W3W4W5W6484245362924
View chart data

W1: 48 · W2: 42 · W3: 45 · W4: 36 · W5: 29 · W6: 24

Open findings by severityWeek 6 · 24 total findings
Critical
2
High
6
Medium
12
Low
4

Severity is one input. Add exposure, access, and business impact before assigning priority.

Asset assessment coverage216 assessed / 240 inventoried assets
90%ASSESSED
216 assetsassessed in sample inventory

24 assets remain outside assessment coverage.

● Assessed: 216 (90%)○ Not assessed: 24 (10%)

Review the unassessed assets before interpreting the findings trend as complete.

Remediation work queue40 tracked items · current status
Open9
In progress7
Awaiting validation6
Validated18
FOR YOUR ARCHITECTURE REVIEW

Go deeper into the details.

Review integration patterns, an example evidence schema, and the questions to answer about deployment, access, and data handling.

Technical overview ↗Explore integration patterns ↗
YOUR NEXT STEP

Put your environment
in perspective.

Discuss your priorities, technical requirements, and the scope that fits your team.

Talk to skur.ai ↗